Lumbermens underwriting alliance losses

Law of June 30,N. Statements made by the insurer, or its agent, made after the policy is issued may be deemed to modify the policy where the requisite elements are met.

If our management fails to apply these funds effectively, we may not be successful in our efforts to grow our business and revenues. Fidelity maintains that the term only encompasses legal damages awarded by a court of law.

Our continued success will depend in part on our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to these and other changing conditions. The court ruled in favor of the municipality, stating: The present action, of course, was initiated prior to our decision in Insurance Case I and we are, as anticipated, confronted with an issue resulting from further confusion over the interpretation to be given certain provisions within the same area of our insurance laws.

There is also some suggestion that the rule of "contra proferentum" will not apply in disputes among insurers or that otherwise involve sophisticated parties. American Home Assurance Co. Reference to these sources is especially appropriate in insurance disputes because of the fairly standardized policy language.

There is some authority that the agent may have a duty to speak, and his failure to do so constitutes a misrepresentation. We do not operate Krispy Kreme stores in any of these Ohio counties.

There, we also reviewed the statutes creating the Facility and discussed in detail what we understood to be the intent of our Legislature in creating this form of automobile insurance administration.

We believe that our significant vendors will be Year compliant.

State Ex Rel. Hunt v. NC REINSURANCE FAC.

Krispy Kreme is a leading branded specialty retailer of premium quality doughnuts which are made throughout the day in our stores.

June 18, landlord's receipt of lead abatement notice from City did not put him on notice of a potential "occurrence" involving apartment occupants and Winstead v.


If, however, the meaning of words or the effect of provisions is uncertain or capable of several reasonable interpretations, the doubts will be resolved against the insurance company and in favor of the policyholder. Our success is based on the strengths described below. The Facility is structured by law to operate on a no profit-no loss basis, and the rates charged drivers ceded to the Facility must reflect this: In addition, some of our officers and directors are also franchisees, or affiliated with franchisees.

Products underwritten by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company. The summarized coverage descriptions are used for reference only and do not contain relevant policy conditions, exclusions, or limitations.

Products and discounts not available to all persons in all states and are subject to underwriting guidelines, review, and approval. The plan provided for the creation of formerly connected with the Lumbermens Underwriting Alliance a reserve fund before an saving not exceeding 25cents, of premium of Kansas City.

The attorney is allowed 25% of premiums. deposits shallbereturne tosubscribers. All losses (coverages A+B+C) caused by the windstorm peril should be counted in determining whether the windstorm deductible has been reached. Loss adjustment costs should be borne by the insurer, even if the loss does not exceed the windstorm deductible.

The windstorm deductible does not apply to loss-of-use coverage (D). ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE USA LUMBERMENS MUT CAS GRP ALLMERICA FINANCIAL CORP UTICA NATL INS GRP ZURICH INS GRP SAFECO INS GRP AMERICAN FAMILY INS GRP ERIE INS GRP Box II.1 Homeowners Insurance Policy Provisions Policy Form Policy Limits Wind Exclusion Type Freq.

Morrisville Water & Light Dept. v. USF&G, CO., 775 F. Supp. 718 (D. Vt. 1991)

Dist Source: ISO Data Base Figure II.2 Entries and Exits in Homeowners Insurance. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Group Allianz Insurance Group Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance N Military Trail Manager, SQA/Property Contract Vice President/Governmental Affairs NCMIC Group, Inc.

Mark Arch Insurance Company Quinn Consultant () ext. Sun Alliance Ins. Co., F.2d at The Travelers Court concluded that the continuity element was clearly satisfied: "The [defendant parents] took care of [the victim child] on a daily basis over the course of more than four years.

Thus, the time of the babysitting services was neither irregular nor of limited duration." Travelers Indem.

BUTLER WELDMENTS v. LIBERTY MUT. INS. Lumbermens underwriting alliance losses
Rated 0/5 based on 67 review
Welcome to Tony's website!